Essay Writing Advice - Writing Consistently, Creating a Powerful Argument

Essay Writing Advice - Writing Consistently, Creating a Powerful ArgumentIf you've just finished a great course on persuasive writing or you've just finished a great course on getting to know a prospective client, then you have undoubtedly come across a sample persuasive essay or a sample persuasive dissertation. Perhaps you have also come across sample articles on persuasive writing from other sources. In my experience, it is usually the latter that you come across more often as the author of the article has probably written one or more of these.One of the reasons that we have come to view writing and reading as an art is that of making persuasive essays and persuasive dissertations much more dynamic and entertaining. And while a great deal of effort has gone into the creation of the practice and technique, one of the most important, yet neglected aspects is the content. While we can certainly go to great lengths to increase the professional quality of our work, it is only when the content is unmatchable that we can truly achieve our personal best in the arena of writing.That brings us to the crux of the matter with regard to writing a persuasive essay. To put it simply, if you are writing a persuasive essay or a persuasive dissertation, you must not forget that the purpose of your article or writing is to persuade the reader. Yes, this may sound a bit too simple, but I promise you that people will not read your article, rather they will either skim it or see through it and decide whether or not to be persuaded. And so we need to try and convince, rather than merely convince.To begin with, however, let's look at some of the elements of a persuasive essay and a persuasive dissertation. In essence, both of these writing exercises revolve around what we call the cause/effect formula. The reason for this is that most people are quick to respond to claims made with examples - they see the example, they see the person or thing, and so they 'connect' the two together , rather than going down the pathway of thinking for themselves and seeing where the claim leads. Now there is nothing wrong with such a relationship being established between the example and the conclusion, as long as you do not fall into the trap of placing the same point more than once, without actually backing it up with real evidence.If you write a persuasive essay or a persuasive dissertation, then this means that you must be able to make the argument a little more personal, and so incorporate yourself into the message, rather than just repeating a scenario that you have already written about elsewhere. This means that if you want to write a persuasive essay or a persuasive dissertation, you should be looking to add your own voice and emotion to the piece.As well as this, you must also think about what kind of impact you are hoping to create on your readers by presenting them with a particular set of circumstances. For example, if you are writing a persuasive essay about a par ticular subject, then you will find it easier to pull together the specific facts and then the key points and tie it all together with the conclusion. However, if you are writing about a different issue, you should try and tackle the whole issue in an abstract fashion, rather than being too emotional or too simplistic.So the next time you are faced with writing a persuasive essay or a persuasive dissertation, do not lose focus on the content. Remember that content is king, so take it and write it.

Robespierre 1794 Essays - French First Republic, Montagnards

Robespierre 1794 1794 Paris, France At the expense of thousands of lives, the recent terror that has struck France has helped to rescue France from the brink of total collapse. The leadership of Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety have created a powerful military, rid France of internal opposition, and placed a much needed cap on the price of essential goods. While the mass butchery seems inhumane and drastic, this time period of terror was completely necessary. Though it may sound harsh, many problems were solved that had been threatening France from within and outside its borders during this time of terror. During this time of terror, France has been able to drive all of its enemies off French soil, crush all revolts that had been brewing within the French providence's, and hold off what could have been a devastating famine. All of the French people have been forced to contribute towards the war effort. All unmarried men were forced to join the military, married men made weapons, women made tents and served as battle nurses, and children made bandages and gunpowder. All of this support for France's army, although forced, proved invaluable beside a strict discipline policy. The French army has overwhelmed the enemy forces by the large numbers of men. In the past two and a half years of fighting, almost all enemies have been driven off French soil, Flanders has been retaken, and the army has established a new Batavian Republic in Holland. Aside from fending off foreign invasion, the ?Reign of Terror? also served to help resolve the problems that had been threatening France from within. The Committee of Public Safety had put forth steadfast efforts to resolve order to the French countryside, where revolts jeopardized the nations security. Anyone suspected of opposing Robespierre's ?Republic of Virtue? could be convicted and executed without any evidence being heard on the defendants behalf. Brutal and wrongful as it was, the action of the Committee of Public Safety was essential in extinguishing the rebellious uprisings that threatened France. France was successful in battling off enemies from afar and within, yet it was faced with another threat, famine. Food prices were dangerously high and to avoid mass starvation, the Committee of Public Safety issued the Law of the Maximum. This new law demanded that forty goods, including corn, flour, firewood and oil were to be frozen until further notice. This new law also fixed people's wages and those who broke the maximum were subject to death. The law had some faults, namely the fact that many other goods prices continued to rise while wages remained frozen. In spite of the law's imperfections, the Law of the Maximum helped France survive the famine. Considering all of the benefits France was able to acquire during the ?Reign of Terror,? it is appropriate to say that the ends justified the means, as brutal as the means happened to be. European History